Brief analysis of drug trafficking crime in peruvian legislation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18259/iet.2018006

Keywords:

Drug trafficking, mitigating circumstances, aggravating circumstances, production circumstances, marketing, commercialization, acts for the purpose

Abstract

The following paper sets an analysis of drug trafficking illicit crime, covering its background in Peru history, its current legislation, as well as two cases which will serve as a reference to elucidate the problems including the mitigating and aggravating factors of this crime. Furthermore, we will be able to identify the intervening subjects and the protected legal right, which will help to carry out a normative analysis with the systematic structure of our legislation.

References

Cáceres J. (2008). Habeas corpus contra el autoapertorio de instrucción. Lima: Grijley.

Mendoza, F. (2012).La necesidad de una imputación concreta en el desarrollo del proceso penal cognitivo. Arequipa: San Bernardo.

República, C. d. (s.f.).Narcotráfico y política. 85.

Prado, V. (2017).Derecho penal parte especial: los delitos. Lima: PUCP.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-21

Issue

Año 4 - Número 4 (2018)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ius et Tribunalis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.